Article body
Scholars and scientists alike all seem to be in agreement that nanotechnology will undoubtedly be a significant science in future years and this is evidenced by the noteworthy focus on and release of fresh nanotechnology news. Some are going as far as calling nanotech research the 21st century science. Current nanotech research which focuses directly on micro particles and nanostructures will be used in the future in cosmetics, beauty aids, wine flavorings, cleaning products, and in the production of self cleaning clothing.
The future of nanotechnology, as documented in recent nanotechnology news, also promises some considerable advances in the medical fields and in the food industries. This certainly is promising for anyone interested in the study of nanotechnology information and/or nanotechnology jobs. Yet, with all of the positive views pertaining to nanotechnology and the ever present advances in nanotechnology, some scientists and scholars actually fear the act of trusting the science, and are worried about the potential ramifications that may or may not accompany nanotechnologies.
Considerable concern exists with the question pertaining to what effect nanoparticles have on the human body, if any effect at all. This question, to this date, remains unanswered, and some scientists fear that the presence of nanoparticles in the human body, over time, may pose some sort of threat. Since nanoparticles are so tiny, there is considerable belief that nanoparticles can sneak through natural defenses, into cell membranes, and potentially transport foreign materials between human strands of DNA. The effects of nanoparticles on the human body have potentially harmful results and this prospect is considerably frightening to some. Some studies recently released aren’t too promising. Fish that have consumed carbon nanoparticles have been tested and have developed brain cancer, so there may indeed be a correlation between the two. Also, alternative studies conducted on rats reveal a correlation between inhaled carbon nanotubes and respiratory dysfunction: ailments considerably similar to the symptoms one develops from asbestos exposure.
John Balbus, Chief Health Scientist at Environmental Defense, asserts that there is little to fear, but that prudence is needed. There are currently some institutions which are demanding and campaigning for rigid checking systems and testing. Currently, the Food and Drug Administration announced that nanoparticles pose no public hazard and that anything manufactured with nanotechnology does not require unique and specified testing. This can prove detrimental to the public if, in the future, scientists suddenly begin revealing an issue with nanoparticles and how they affect human beings on a cellular level through exposure. The United Kingdom government recently released a report suggesting that stringent detection and nanoparticle measurement restrictions need to be implemented. The level of human exposure to nanoparticles also needs to be monitored, the degree of potential toxicity must be revealed, and the environmental effects of nanotechnology must also be assessed.

Additional Commentaries and remarks